Practicing writing

David Wagner

In the past years I have been learning about technical writing. In this article I review two books that helped me to improve my writing skills. Then, I present how I practice writing at home and at work.

Discovering writing

As a scientist I published technical reports, journal papers and even a 200 pages long doctoral thesis, but I knew little about writing, a communication skill that can be learned and improved. I left academia and I got a job as a software engineer. I stopped following science and started learning programming languages and study industry best practices.

One summer I read REWORK, a book written by Basecamp’s founders. The chapter Hire great writers explains the authors’ preference in hiring candidates who can demonstrate great writing skills because clear and efficient written communication is essential in their distributed and asynchronous working style. I was an employee and I didn’t plan to hire anybody, but the emphasis on high-quality writing inspired me to become a better writer.

I looked at my own working habits and, somewhat naively, realized the obvious: I write all the time. Instant messaging, code commits, pull-requests, code reviews, project proposals, incident reports are all a form of writing. I wanted to learn what good writing is and how to write well.

I searched for resources targeted at practitioners who write technical text. In the next sections I present two books from which I learned the most.

Book: BUGS In Writing

The book BUGS In Writing by Lyn Dupré is a catalog of common mistakes. It comprises short, easily digestible segments. Each segment presents a principle to make your technical writing clear and lucid. The principles are illustrated by witty example phrases and numerous cat photos.

I encountered this book through a reference in Chris Okasaki’s thesis Purely Functional Data Structures:

I was extremely fortunate to have had excellent English teachers in high school. Lori Huenink deserves special recognition; her writing and public speaking classes are undoubtedly the most valuable classes I have ever taken, in any subject. In the same vein, I was lucky enough to read my wife’s copy of Lyn Dupré’s BUGS in Writing just as I was starting my thesis. If your career involves writing in any form, you owe it to yourself to buy a copy of this book.

When I read this recommendation I immediately ordered a copy. BUGS in Writing is a fantastic handbook. When I have doubts about a specific word or expression I search for advise in the book.

To give a taste of Dupré’s style, here’s an example from the segment Impact, where you learn about the one of the most overused, ugly words in the English language:

There are only two pleasing uses of impact: to denote a forceful collision, and to mean packed or wedged in.

Here the principle is that:

[…] you should not use impact when you mean influence or effect, and you certainly should not use impact when you mean affect, because impacting people is incredibly impolite.

When you learn about such principles you develop ear for detecting bugs in texts and your tolerance for buzzwords and corporate jargon decreases.

Book: On Writing Well

William Zinsser On Writing Well is really what its subtitle claims: the classic guide to writing nonfiction. This book showed me how a professional writer thinks about writing methods, style, structure and genres. The book has a chapter on writing about science and technology, but it also treats business writing, writing about arts, sports and even memoirs.

Zinsser warns about clutter, every piece of text that doesn’t do useful work. He suggests stripping every sentence to its barest bones: delete pompous words, redundant adjectives, jargon and replace laborious phrases with short words that mean the same thing.

Writing a clean sentence is hard work. And the work is non-linear and iterative: rewriting is the essence of writing as Zinsser puts it.

Writing a blog

In 2013 I published the first article on this blog. I wanted to write, but I didn’t know what to write about. A common dilemma of the aspiring writer. In a few years I published a handful of short articles on random topics. Some of them were meta-articles on setting up this blog. Some were as simple as connecting a LED and a button to a Raspberry Pi. Unexpectedly, I had a few “hits” too: many friends liked the article on my working habits.

Around 2017 I changed my writing strategy. Instead of overthinking the subject of my next article, I decided that my hobby projects should end with an entry on my blog. While working on a project I take notes and write outlines. When I’m finished (or bored) I have a seed of a new article. I still have to work hard to make my notes into a coherent story, but I feel that the goal, the published article, is reachable.

Writing at work

In my team we improve code using pull-requests, changes that typically comprise few dozen to few hundred lines of code. We prefer small batches of code changes that are easy to review. The risk of breaking existing systems is lower than if we changed everything at once. But through these incremental changes it’s hard to see the context in which a given pull-request makes sense.

I felt the team needed a document that shows how each code change fits into the story of the project. Earlier, my team had considered writing change request documents but some felt it bureaucratic and, frankly, we didn’t know how to write them well.

Last December at work I started a new project that required changes in many subsystems. I described my implementation plan on the company wiki. In few sentences I created a design document.

I started the implementation and as I learned more about the problem domain I refined the design and I updated the document with my progress. If you’d read the document you would have known what’s been done and what’s left to do. The wiki page became a project page.

Of course my initial design had holes and I discovered traps and dead ends. I recorded my failings on the same wiki page which evolved into an experience report.

When I finished the implementation I collected instructions for operators, the support team and for other developers, transforming the page into project documentation.

A few months later when I reread this page I found a historical record that explains why and how we arrived to state we have today.

During this process I found a few practices useful:

  • I rewrite the same document as we work on the project. The document is always the entry point for all project-relevant information.

  • I write prose with complete sentences to build context. A few words with bullet points, list of ticket IDs are insufficient.

  • I often reference related content. There’s no need to repeat what’s explained elsewhere.

  • I share every major revision with my colleagues asking for reviews and suggestions.

The time spent evolving this page was worth it. I felt that the state of the page reflected the stage of the project. If a project needs long pages to explain, it’s too big. If a few words can’t express what I’m doing, the project is ill-defined, or I lack some knowledge to execute it.


I wrote during my whole career, but only lately I have been cultivating my writing skills. I practice writing in my free time and professionally. I document my hobby projects and software experiments on my blog and I write “evolving” documents on the company’s internal wiki.